People of the third way

1 April 2011 — 6 Comments

This is an updated version of something I wrote a few years ago. One of the comments to a recent post about the Love Wins controversy inspired me to revisit it…

This is Gamla. Or more precisely, what’s left of it.

The ruins of Gamla. The Sea of Galilee is visible from the topmost peak.

Carved into a steep hillside northeast of Galilee, Gamla is where the Jewish Zealot movement was born. Zealots demanded strict adherence to the law and total separation from anyone who didn’t believe exactly as they did.

To be a Zealot was to be perpetually angry. Angry at the apostasy of your own people. But most of all, angry at the occupation. Because if you were Jewish and alive in the first century, your destiny was not in your own hands. You were a subject of the Roman Empire. Your destiny was in pagan hands.

Zealots couldn’t abide by that. Occupation had to be resisted by any means necessary. There were rumors in Galilee of Zealot assassins who roamed the streets by night, carrying small daggers called sicarii with which they silently cut down their enemies.

To a Zealot, God’s kingdom advanced on the tip of a sword.

And if he ever needed reminding of who (and where) his enemies were, a Zealot could simply climb atop his fortress and look across the Sea of Galilee.

There, on the opposite shore. Tiberias.

Tiberius in the distance, located on the western shore of Galilee

Tiberias was established during Jesus’ lifetime. An entire city built by Herod Antipas, puppet-king of Galilee, to honor his new boss, the Emperor Tiberius. (Apparently, Herod had trouble with spelling.)

The city of Tiberias was home to the Herodians, Jewish families who had allied themselves to Herod Antipas and, by extension, to Rome itself. The Herodians didn’t believe in God’s kingdom; they were too busy building one for themselves in Tiberias.

The Zealots’ response to occupation was to fight. The Herodians’ response was to make the most of it — and, if they could, make a buck from it.

Two extremes, literally on opposite shores of the sea.

Caught in the middle, on the northern edge of Galilee, was Capernaum. Home base, as it were, for Jesus and his followers.

While the Herodians loved their friends (those they could benefit from) and the Zealots hated their enemies, Jesus climbed a hill between Tiberias and Gamla and said:

Love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you, that you may be children of your Father in heaven.

While the Herodians cashed in on Roman oppression and Zealots fought back with swords, Jesus taught:

Do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other cheek also. And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well. If anyone forces you to go one mile, go with them two miles.

Jesus stood between the extremes of groveling accommodation and reciprocal violence and offered a third way. He rejected the separatist impulse of the Zealots and the opportunistic impulse of the Herodions. Instead, he taught his followers to subvert evil with love. Not the kind of love that involves becoming everyone’s doormat. But the kind that seizes the initiative, exposes oppression for what it truly is, and always — ALWAYS — leaves the door open for the oppressor to repent.

Exploring Jesus’ command to go the extra mile, Walter Wink once wrote:

A soldier could impress a civilian to carry his pack one mile only; to force the civilian to go further carried with it severe penalties under military law. Nevertheless, this levy was a bitter reminder to the Jews that they were a subject people even in the Promised Land.

Jesus does not counsel revolt. One does not “befriend” the soldier, draw him aside, and drive a knife into his ribs.

But why walk the second mile?

The question here is how the oppressed can recover the initiative, how they can assert their human dignity. The rules are Caesar’s but not how one responds to the rules.

Imagine then the soldier’s surprise when, at the next mile marker, he reluctantly reaches to assume his pack. You say, “Oh no, let me carry it another mile.” Normally he has to coerce your kinsmen to carry his pack; now you do it cheerfully and will not stop! Is this a provocation? Are you insulting his strength? Being kind? Trying to get him disciplined for seeming to make you go farther than you should?

From a situation of servile impressment, you have once more seized the initiative. You have taken back the power of choice. The soldier is thrown off-balance by being deprived of the predictability of your response.

Some readers may object to the idea of discomfiting the soldier. But can people engaged in oppressive acts repent unless made uncomfortable with their actions? Loving confrontation can free both the oppressed from docility and the oppressor from sin.

Being followers of Jesus means becoming people of the third way. People who transcend categories, stereotypes, and extremes. People who are not co-opted by a single ideology, whose response to evil cannot be predicted based on all the usual categories. People who rise above polarization and find compelling and creative ways to bring heaven to earth, bit by bit.

In fact, it is by doing so that we truly become followers of Jesus.

Take another look at Matthew 5. Notice the connection between loving your enemies and being children of God.

Many in Galilee thought they were automatically God’s people because of what was on their birth certificate: descendant of Abraham. They saw themselves as the elect, the chosen, the predestined.

You can imagine how this kind of thinking cultivated in people an “us vs. them” mentality. Just like the one that incited the Zealots to violence.

When Jesus spoke these words in Matthew 5, there were, doubtless, Zealots or Zealot sympathizers among the broader audience. Imagine what it was like for them to hear this itinerant rabbi — who they hoped was the Messiah who would lead them into battle against Rome — tell them, “If you want to be God’s children, then you must learn to love your enemy.”

I imagine that was the last time many Zealots had anything to do with Jesus.

What if being the people of God isn’t defined by how well we separate ourselves from those who don’t believe as we do, but rather by how well we love those who don’t believe as we do?

Finally… it’s worth remembering that neither the Zealots nor Herodians lived to see the end of the first century. The Herodians, lost in the pursuit of power and comfort, cast their lot with the family of Herod. After the first century, there were no more Herods to benefit from.

As for the Zealots, in A.D. 67, Rome laid siege to Gamla, breaching the city wall and killing thousands. Those who survived the attack committed mass suicide, jumping off cliffs above the village. Later, the Zealots briefly took control of Jerusalem and ruled with a brutality surpassing that of their enemies.

Their legacy is a reminder that violence breeds only more violence. Extremism breeds extremism. Oppression breeds oppression.

As followers of Jesus, we are called to break the cycle of violence. We are called to be people of the third way.

The breach in the wall at Gamla, where Vespasian’s army broke through

About these ads

6 responses to People of the third way

  1. 

    Ben, I’m sitting here in Gettysburg, PA tonight on the 150th anniversary of the battle here. There was nothing “civil” about this war – brothers set upon brothers, Americans killing Americans, Christians dealing death to other Christians. It’s unimaginable. Knowing that I’m frolicking on the land that so much blood was spilled on is a very strange feeling. Thank you for your words. They come at an appropriate time as I wonder how I am supposed to react, in light of the teachings you present here, to the presence of evil in this world. May we lean on those who came before us and learn more fully what it is to be people of the third way.

Trackbacks and Pingbacks:

  1. A God who doesn’t want to be found? « Ben Irwin's blog - February 8, 2012

    [...] remember that everything Jesus said was spoken against the backdrop of Roman occupation. There was an intense debate raging among the Jews over what to do about their situation. Some said cooperate with Rome; others advocated violent [...]

  2. Colorado burning | Ben Irwin - June 27, 2012

    [...] orders. Galilee and the surrounding area was a tinderbox of Jewish resentment against Rome. (See this post for more about the political climate of first-century Galilee.) It’s more than likely these [...]

  3. A theology of patriotism? | Ben Irwin - July 4, 2012

    [...] his listeners, Jesus articulated an uncompromising stand against military resistance, even against the cruelest of [...]

  4. People of the Third Way | Global Voices of Nonviolence - August 15, 2012

    [...] World Vision, a global NGO fighting poverty and injustice. This post was originally published on Ben’s blog. We’re grateful that Ben has allowed us to use it here. Share this:TwitterFacebookLike [...]

  5. Colorado burning (again) « Ben Irwin - June 14, 2013

    […] orders of the Roman governor. Galilee was a tinderbox of resentment against Roman occupation. (See this post for more about the political climate of first-century Galilee.) It’s more than likely these […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s